What is Depth Astrology?

Click here to learn more.
I Took The Handmade Pledge! BuyHandmade.org

The Slow, Salty Dance of Taurus

I read today that the glyph for Taurus is the same one used in medieval alchemy to indicate rock salt. It wasn’t far from that little factoid to the realization that the affinity between rock salt and Taurus goes way beyond the glyph.

The usual metaphor for Taurus is a strong, solid, solitary mountain:

“Persons born under this earthy, fixed sign are as strong, as steady as the enduring magnificence of a great mountain. Through the years, the mountain stands impervious to the onslaughts of weather, time, floods, droughts and fire, and remains – beckoning our respect and admiration. Its presence creates a beautiful picture, a landmark, a symbol of security for us to identify with, now and for years to come. Taurus individuals are a lot like that beautiful mountain. They seem to have a timeless quality, solid as the Rock of Gibraltar, apparently unchanged by the tide of human events, and unmoved by the pettiness of other mortals around them.” (Source)

The metaphor isn’t wrong. But the idea of rock salt has got my imagination spinning again.

Alan and I once visited the Devil’s Golf Course salt pan in Death Valley, California. I thought I’d been sufficiently awed by Niagara Falls in New York, by Dades Gorge in Morocco, by deep, dark caves hung with stalagmites and stalactites somewhere along the Oregon coast. But the awe of the beautiful, the powerful and the sodden paled in comparison to the utter desolation of the salt flats.

In gorges, falls and caves, you can see water at work in different ways. It blasts through rock, carves pathways into earth, pounds into cliffsides for millennia until it wears down the rough spots and smoothes them all out. Even glaciers, unhurried though they are, leave telltale signs of their work in the shapes of the mountains above them. You can see what they’ve done.

In a salt pan, though, the demands on imagination are legion. It appears to be utterly unmoved, unacted-upon. But of course, it is not.

A salt pan is an unfathomably desolate stretch of off-white land – but not actually land; covered land: land covered with sheets, rocks and grains of salt – patterned with low, imprecise ridges like uneven puzzle pieces. Unlike the slippery edge of a waterfall, you can walk on it (though you must be careful of mud floes underneath) and, unlike twisting caves, its wide-open-wideness allows you to see great distances without obstruction.

Unlike mountains, the largest of which are used more for beauty and pleasure than for industry (at least on the surface), salt pans are immediately practical and inescapably proletariat. While it’s literally true that their products require processing before they make it to table, it is tempting to claim that salt pans offer the opportunity for anyone to show up, shovel up a bucketful, and take it home for consumption. This salt-of-the-earth everyman characteristic rings truer to me of Taurus than the faraway reach and treacherous climb demanded by the mountains in the distance. As long as you demand little of Taurus, Taurus will demand little of you back.

Too, salt pans are horizontal, not vertical like mountains. Vertical is more fiery, less earthy; it suggests the up-and-down of droplets and flames, not the back-and-forth of earth and air. Earth only rises and falls in discomfort, when tension builds too high or the heaviness of water weighs it down. This may be true of Taurus in an imbalanced state, but in its balanced state the horizontal lines of salt must be considered. Taurus reaches wide, opens its arms for a gift or a morsel or a French-kiss – not for the dizzying heights of the mountain-climber, the cliff-dweller.

But perhaps the most compelling comparison comes through the birth story of the salt pan itself:

“A salt pan is formed where water pools. A salt pan would be a lake or a pond if it were located in a climate where the rate of water evaporation were not faster than the rate of water precipitation, i.e., if it were not in a desert. If the water is unable to drain into the ground, it remains on the surface until it evaporates, leaving behind whatever minerals were dissolved. Over thousands of years, the minerals (usually salts) accumulate on the surface.” (Source)

What strikes me here is the implication of passivity and patience. Unlike its zodiacal predecessor, Aries, Taurus is not hell-bent on seeking the quest of the solar hero. It is satisfied to a less obvious existence, a longer wait, a slower turn of its world. Yet it is fecund and sensual, and it brooks no intrusion on its sovereignty over its own potentate. So, again, the image of a mountain being imperceptibly shaped by its glaciers – while perhaps delightful to certain Scorpios – will not hold well with the Taurus.

Taurus has its own shape within it already, its own salt rocks, large and small, ready to give themselves up to the earth once time and patience have had their way. The passivity often attributed to Taurus may be a projection of more active signs’ impatience with the amount of time it takes for water to evaporate from the sea.

[ad]

  • Share/Bookmark

Spiritual Spelunking

A friend of mine, an avowed atheist, has been sending me questions about astrology and my belief system. The most recent question came a couple weeks ago and plunged me into a maze of thought. He asked:

Do you feel that your belief system is simply the explanation for the world that fits you, or is it somehow objectively superior to other systems of belief?

Here’s my response:

Dear K,

I’ve actually been thinking about your question a lot. To be honest, your question made me try to define what my belief system is. I feel like I live it every day, to a greater or lesser degree, but I’ve never really been able to define it so I’ve always just kind of let it lie and trusted that I understood as much as I needed to for the time being. Your question made me return to my question again and I find that I’m better able, now, to define my belief system than I ever have been before.

The first thing I have to say is that astrology is not my belief system. It’s part of my spirituality, but it’s not the whole thing or even really the centerpiece. I’d say it’s an expression of it and a really useful way into my beliefs — and, very importantly, back out of them into everyday life. Maybe like other people would consider the Bible. MAYBE. (NOTE: I’m bracing for the backlash on this assertion. If anyone wants, I’ll explain further in a future post.)

So, that said, I think the dichotomy you’ve set up isn’t really fair. I think there are other ways to characterize belief systems than either “simply the explanation for the world that fits [me]” or “objectively superior to other systems of belief.” I came to my spirituality, as did, I assume, many other people, to many different systems, because other ways of experiencing the Divine (or whatever you want to call it) didn’t feel quite right to me. I searched and searched — mostly internally, some externally — until I knew what I believed. I could feel it resonate on many levels within me, in many spheres of my life.

I think that, in the best scenario, we each find our way to our own spiritual core, and that core resonates with other people’s spiritual cores. Maybe not exactly but enough that some community can be forged around the collective corpus. So in that respect, it’s both individual and collective. But “collective” doesn’t mean “objective,” if by objective you mean scientifically provable.

I don’t think there really is such a thing as objective reality when you’re talking about the great mysteries such as Who are we? Why are we here? What is the relationship of the individual to the universe? What is eternity? What is eternal? What dies when my body does, and what, if anything, doesn’t? So to say my belief system is objectively superior is a signal that my ego is attached, first, to having definitive answers to those unanswerable questions and, second, to the correctness of my answers. I think that when the ego is too attached to having something, or to being right about something, that is where power finds a foothold.

Not that power is all bad, but when it is invited into the faith equation, what I’ve noticed is that we build up hierarchies and institutions around belief systems, which makes no sense to me at all. That’s when the beliefs become more system. It all becomes about what we are in this world — our position vis-a-vis others, our puffed-up chests, the set-up of one person against or over or below another. We cling to the territory we’ve claimed as “the right way” and then feel required to defend it. To me, this all runs completely counter to the mystery questions and separates the person from the Spirit. When beliefs create rifts between people, I think it is because worldly concerns have gotten in the way. I think God (or whoever) is sitting up there (or wherever) laughing his/her divine ass off. And also crying at the same time.

Yet — I guess there are people who can practice their faith in solitude, but to me the fact that belief systems do often develop into institutions says something to me about the importance, to most people who have beliefs, of coming together in community to recognize and practice their shared faith. So that’s why I think it’s a false dichotomy to say my spirituality, or anyone’s, is either individual or objectively superior. It’s neither. We come together because it’s not individual, yet each faith community takes a different form because there is no objective reality or superiority when it comes to pondering and responding to the mysteries.

Are you going to come visit us? I already told Alan you might. We would really love to see you.

Kathy

[ad]

  • Share/Bookmark

Growth

It’s been a long time since I posted: I’ve been growing.

I’ve been exhuming my innate knowledge of how to keep house, play with toddlers and get dinner on the table at a decent hour. I’ll blog about that here soon.

I’ve also been doing chart interpretations and reading more books on astrology than I’ve been able to get to in a long time. I feel like I’ve finally made it across the desert to a cool, deep well.

And I’ve been planning and promoting workshops — not only here in L.A. but now a week-long one in Taos, New Mexico, slated for October 12-19. Put it on your calendar and check back here for more info soon!

Finally, I’ve been building new skills and expanding my audience over at Offsprung.com, a humorous website for parents. I didn’t think I could write funny, and trying my hand at it has definitely been a challenge: Check out my inaugural column here. But in the yin-yang of life, it’s been fun to push myself into a new way of seeing the world and communicating about it. It’s also been a wonderful reminder not to take myself too seriously — a crime I tend to commit serially.

While I use the Offsprung opportunity to poke fun at myself, at the poorly-formed public image of astrology, and at the world at large, I do try to balance it with a little dose of serious information about horoscopes, astrologers and the state of the stars each time I write: I’m hoping to indoctrinate readers one-by-unsuspecting-one.

So this space will likely be a bit slower for a few more weeks as I find my sea legs in the world of online snark, sarcasm and parenting advice. But don’t give up on me! I’ll be back, deepening the tracks of depth astrology on a regular basis once again.

(Photo credit)

  • Share/Bookmark