What is Depth Astrology?

Click here to learn more.
I Took The Handmade Pledge! BuyHandmade.org

On Endings, Choice and Control

I know. I’ve been gone a long time.

I expected the holidays would make my posting sparse, but I didn’t plan on being absent for four-plus weeks, and I’m especially sorry to my regular readers. The reason for my long silence is that we had a tragedy in our family — an unexpected death, a death by suicide.

Click to continue reading “On Endings, Choice and Control”

I know. I’ve been gone a long time.

I expected the holidays would make my posting sparse, but I didn’t plan on being absent for four-plus weeks, and I’m especially sorry to my regular readers. The reason for my long silence is that we had a tragedy in our family — an unexpected death, a death by suicide.

Click to continue reading “On Endings, Choice and Control”

  • Share/Bookmark

Pluto in Capricorn: The Shadow Afoot in Dreams and in Life

This morning, as we do roughly every Monday or Tuesday, a friend and I got on the phone to discuss one dream each that we’d had over the weekend. Though this morning our respective dreams were quite different, they both had the same apocalyptic feeling that seems to be pervading the whole world lately.

In my astrologer’s mind, it was the feeling of Pluto moving into Capricorn:

  • In my dream, I was with a group of friends in an outdoor mall where only one store was open and operating.  We heard, and then saw, a huge, heavy military plane fly very low overhead. It looked like a stealth bomber. We watched as it slowly got lower and lower, skimming treetops and power lines, then finally crashed into the ground nearby.
  • In my friend’s dream, she was with her teenage daughter on a hilltop in Los Angeles. The hill slowly gave way under their feet and came sliding down to the ground below. They were okay in the end, but the entire hill was just gone from underneath them.

Astrologers are fond of pointing out that, around the time Pluto was discovered in 1930, atomic bombs were developed and fascism and Nazism reared their heads — frightening metaphors for the kind of cataclysmic and totalitarian destruction that can be wrought by Plutonian power. Pluto breaks things down into their unseen parts, forces us to look at them and remixes them into new, unfamiliar and sometimes terrifying structures. Pluto is the life-death-rebirth cycle in all its imaginable forms.

A less truly frightening Plutonian metaphor of 1930 was the debut that year of the U.S. radio drama The Shadow – with actor Frank Readick, Jr. intoning the iconic introduction:

“Who knows what evil lurks in the hearts of men? Heh-heh-heh-heh-heh-heh-heh! The Shadow knows…”

In Jungian terms, the shadow is psychological material that gains its power from the very fact that it is repressed. It’s usually repressed because it’s something we don’t want to admit about ourselves. The more we repress it, the bigger and more powerful it grows, creating projection situations where we can see it only outside of ourselves.

For example, did you ever despise someone for, say, her arrogance, only to be forced to admit that you’ve got a certain self-righteousness about you as well? Or have you ever been the President of a superpower who systematically shut down the freedoms of its own population while embarking on an international campaign for freedom in other countries? The larger and stronger the shadow grows, the greater power it has over you — precisely because you haven’t dared to look at it, to admit it exists, to confront it head-on. And the more you ignore it, the bigger ass-kicking is required to make you pay attention to it.

In the horoscope, any planet can contain shadow material, not just Pluto. But Pluto’s dynamic tends to be the archetypal shadow dynamic — the force of change through exposure of hidden powers — and its expression is generally large-scale and often scary. Yes, Pluto exists in each of our individual horoscope charts, but unless it’s touching a more personal planet in our chart, its effects tend to be wider-spread, more impersonal: across a generation, across a culture.

So we get situations like market “corrections” or terrorist attacks that force us (or should force us) to look at ourselves: Are we, as a culture, a bit too self-righteousness, say, or greedy, or giddy about imposing “freedom” on others without examining our own freedom complex? Are we really as free as we brag about being? As generous? As right?

When Pluto pulls the veil off our eyes, for example when it changes zodiac signs and highlights a different area of life anew, it can feel frightening in the extreme. The last 13 years of Pluto in Sagittarius have been marked by ubiquitous consumption, accelerating depletion of natural resources and idealism-cum-tyranny — the latter starting, I would argue, with the Taliban’s 1996 march across Afghanistan and reaching its climax with the U.S. invasion and occupation of Iraq.

The weaknesses in the structures that have supported these trends are now emerging from the shadows. We are experiencing the breakdowns associated with dictating our ideals in foreign lands, getting drunk on oil fields and building castles on flimsy credit.

Pluto’s movement into Capricorn highlights the reality that the old code is slowly disintegrating. What might be more frightening than that — after all, many of us would like to see regime change here in the U.S. at least — is that we don’t yet know what will come to take its place. This not-knowing can whip up an atmosphere of crisis.

The word crisis comes from the Greek krinein, meaning “to separate.” Also derived from that root are the words criminal, decree, discern, discriminate, excrement and secret: All Plutonian words in that they imply shadowy, secret or hidden elements that need to be separated, sorted and reconnected in new ways — a process that almost always implies crisis of some kind. Separation of a relationship, a limb or an atom requires careful handling in order to reconnect it or remake it or recreate it productively instead of destructively. When separation and reconnection occur, there is always the possibility of something going horribly wrong.

Like powerful military jets crashing in a calm sky and sturdy green hillsides collapsing underfoot, it is hard to imagine such apparently solid structures as markets and governments and capitalism and democracy separating into component parts and being remade in a different form. It might even be frightening to think about this happening: What crisis would ensue if we were separated from our money? If familiar government agencies and commercial storefronts disintegrate and reassemble in some other form? If oil-based energy disappears completely?

But confronting the possibility of change, and admitting where we’ve gone wrong, and remaking those institutions in the spirit of integrity and solidity may bring us together in a way that only true crisis can. Frightening as it may seem to live in this in-between period, we may someday look back at this time and think, “How did we live through that?” and then, “I’m so glad we did!”

Comment below: Have you had dreams about cataclysmic destruction lately?

Photo credits: Stealth bomber, Rose shadow

  • Share/Bookmark

Wall Street, Washington and the Astrology of Change

There are lots of places you can get play-by-play astrological analysis on the Wall Street bailout ballyhoo, and I encourage you to check them out: The brand-spanking-new site AstroDispatch is an excellent place to start. But here, I want to pull back and look wider — not at the specific events or the twirling of particular planets, but at the process itself. Because really: What in the hell is going on?

A little brief background in how astrology sees the world: Basically, there are three types of energy — active, stable and changing. (The technical terms are cardinal, fixed and mutable.) At first glance, you’d think the goings-on in Washington were active energy — I mean, there is a lot of stuff swirling. It doesn’t get much more active than this, right?

Right — kind of.

But this morning we got news that last night’s summit of government leaders broke down into one of the wildest meetings Washington has ever seen. There were proposals and counter-proposals flying frantically back and forth, there were charges of politicizing the event with electoral politics, and at one point  Treasury Secretary Henry Paulson reportedly got down on one knee to beg the Democrats not to “blow up” his proposal.

Nothing, apparently, got done. And that’s what characterizes active energy: You put effort into a process, and out comes a product.

But there is no product out of Washington today.

That’s because the truly active phase has not yet arrived. It may — we hope — arrive this weekend. But right now our lawmakers are still in the grips of changing energy. See, the cycles of our lives, whether in government, in our private lives, in the turning of seasons, or in the lifetimes of stars, all follow this same basic pattern of energy output:

  • Stable. This is where we suckle on the fruits of our labor, where life exists in a certain set way. Your relationship is good, the value of your house more or less rises, Wall Street and Washington work the way they seem always to have worked. On the positive side, it’s a luscious, comfy existence. We don’t have to bother with newness. On the negative side, it’s lazy and/or stubborn — I mean, really, who wants to get up from the couch?
  • Changing. Something occurs that gets you up from the couch. It might be slow change; it might come quickly: A partner has a protracted disease or, at the other extreme, dies suddenly in an accident. Housing prices fall slowly but surely, or one surprise day the Dow Jones drops 1,000 points. If we stay on the couch, we risk being stuck in old and ineffective patterns. But when change is on the doorstep, we should not always act right away. We first need brainstorming, information, consultation, analysis, perspective and synthesis of ideas in order to prepare the way for whatever is next. Granted, sometimes this has to occur quickly. But it still must occur.
  • Active. Armed with information, and perhaps even wisdom, we can move ahead with confidence — letting go of old patterns for good, working to bring about a new order. We pursue a new love interest, we find a new job, we move, we put reasonable regulations in place to prevent the next Great Depression. If we are effective in this phase, we cycle up to a new plateau of stability, where we can once again suckle on the fruits of our labor — until the next change comes.

I see the bailout debate now in a late changing stage. This is the stage, says the Huber perspective, wherein a person, an entity, a country, pours everything they have into a task. It’s like a climber who finally sees the summit he’s after. No result is yet produced — he’s still climbing, and climbing, and climbing — but the end is in sight. We can see it; we know what we want: Stability. Rest. The gorgeous view from the top. We want to get through the changing phase, the active phase, and settle Wall Street back on its couch to get fat again.

But Washington doesn’t yet seem to know how to reach that end. That’s because we first need brainstorming, information, consultation, analysis, perspective and synthesis of ideas in order to prepare the way for whatever is next. We need to complete the changing phase before we can move on to the active phase.

I have a hard time with people who won’t stop to think, to gather information, to analyze and imagine the unfolding of different scenarios. Oh, I don’t care if the question is, “What movie do you want to see?” or even, “What shall we name the baby?” But when the question is, “How shall we save this country’s economy?” or “How shall we spend $700 billion today?” — then I get a little perturbed. Future stability is put at risk when the changing phase — learning, processing, analyzing — is bowled over in the rush to action. Acting prematurely can send us right back into crisis.

Or, at the risk of sounding schoolmarmish: Haste makes waste.

Look, an old structure has been decaying for several years. An old stable phase has been changing and is now in the final throes of its death. Our leaders are scrambling to manifest its next form — to move from a changing phase to an active phase. The sense of urgency — of needing an anchor in stormy waters — is natural at this point. It could almost be no other way. But it does not have to be managed with panic, fear or — worst of all — divisiveness. It can, with the right leadership, be managed with wisdom and perspective, with vision and unity.

Hey, a girl can dream.

P.S. I realize that, after using the word “change” in my headline, I should probably have mentioned something about the presidential candidates’ (over?)use of that word. I plan to analyze each of their charts next week, and the subject of change will no doubt come up. So stay tuned. In the meantime, click below to comment — I’d love to know what you think!

Photo credits: Money, Couch potato, Don’t panic

  • Share/Bookmark